Social Credit Views

Friday, 07 February 2020 10:35

Socialism, Social Credit, and the Monopoly of Credit - Part 4

Written by Arindam Basu
Rate this item
(0 votes)

IV.) The Path Not Taken: Socialism and Social Credit.

     When considering the development and decline of socialism in the twentieth century, it is important to distinguish between two main versions: a revolutionary 'Eastern' socialism that triumphed in Russia, China, Vietnam and elsewhere, and a reformist 'Western' socialism that strongly influenced Europe and North America.  The key difference between the two - evident from the outset in the dispute between Lenin and Kautsky - was the attitude to representative democracy.  In Lenin's words:

'Kautsky departed from Marxism by advocating what is, in the period of finance capital, a 'reactionary ideal', 'peaceful democracy', 'the mere operation of economic factors', for objectively this ideal drags us back from monopoly capitalism to the non-monopolist stage and is a reformist swindle.'  (V. I. Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, Pluto Press, page 117).

     It was the reformist Western version that discovered, considered and ultimately rejected Social Credit; the Eastern version seems to have had no association whatsoever with it, (though according to one source, Vyacheslav Molotov, the famous Soviet foreign minister, stated "There is nothing in the world we fear more").  It is perhaps no exaggeration to say that by doing so, the Socialists missed the opportunity of achieving the same level of success in the West that they had enjoyed in the East.

     The very first Social Credit work of Major Douglas - The Delusion of Super-Production was published in 'The New Age', thanks to A. R. Orage, who, prior to encountering Douglas, had been a guild socialist.  Thus, Social Credit may be said to have emerged on the left side of the political spectrum, (though of course the philosophy of Social Credit transcends left and right, and Douglas himself was a conservative, albeit an unorthodox one.)

     Hence, it was to the Labour Party that the early British Social Crediters directed their attention, as is evident from many of the early writings of Major Douglas, (notably The Control and Distribution of Production).  However, the economic decentralization at the core of Social Credit was altogether incompatible with the political centralization championed by the Fabians, and it is the latter who had the upper hand in Labour.  The final break came with the Labour Committee investigating the 'Douglas-New Age Credit Scheme' turning in an unfavourable report.

     Unsurprisingly, Social Crediters had no more success with the Conservative Party, while efforts to create Social Credit parties in order to enter government directly, were unsuccessful except, of course, in the Canadian province of Alberta, where a Social Credit party came to power, only to see its efforts stymied by the central government.  Curiously, there was also some interest in Social Credit among members of the British Union of Fascists, (see Kerry Bolton's The Banking Swindle, pages 62-64), but although National Socialism was much more open to monetary reform than either Eastern or Western socialism, it seems Social Credit had no influence in the Third Reich itself, nor on subsequent far-right movements.

     One might have thought that the collapse of the Soviet bloc as well as of the Soviet Union itself, and the concomitant discrediting of Marxism would have led to renewed interest in Social Credit from the Left, especially among its radical anti-capitalist wing.  Nothing of the sort happened: on the contrary, the Left opted for virtually every path except monetary reform and Social Credit - be it identity politics, 'market socialism', environmentalism, not to mention 'Third Way' submission to neoliberalism.  Social Credit - the path not taken - became the path altogether forgotten.

     This is all the more surprising when we consider that the initial rejection of Social Credit by the Left (in the inter-war period) may be attributed, at least in part, to the fact that the effects of the Electrical Revolution were not widely appreciated then, whereas those of the Mechanical and French Revolutions were, (hence the tendency for leftist leaders, academics and activists to feel much more comfortable engaging with the teachings of Karl Marx than those of Major Douglas.)  With growing experience and understanding of the Electrical Revolution and its implications, Social Credit would have become both more accessible and more relevant to them - yet, despite this, it received less attention from socialists in the 1990s than it did in the 1930s.  

     In order to account for this, we must analyze socialism from another angle.

Last modified on Friday, 07 February 2020 10:40

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Latest Articles

  • Social Credit as a Negative Feedback Loop
    If we examine the financial system in terms of one of its chief products, i.e., debt, we can easily come to understand the essence of the Social Credit analysis and remedial proposals. In sum, the problem with the existing financial system from a Douglas Social Credit point of view is that it functions after the pattern of a positive feedback loop, amplifying debt, whereas it should, in the interests of stability, functionality, and therefore human satisfaction, function after the pattern of a negative feedback loop, dynamically liquidating excess or surplus debt in the chain of production with debt-free credits. The Social Credit remedial proposals were designed to change the financial dynamic from a positive feedback loop to a negative feedback loop.[1]
    Written on Sunday, 05 April 2020 18:19
  • Social Credit and a Coronavirus UBI
    The great danger, therefore, with a Coronavirus UBI is that, while it may be introduced sans conditions initially, the state, or rather the powers that control the state, might eventually decide to make all sorts of demands on UBI recipients. They may require vaccination, for example, as a condition of receiving it, or specific community services in exchange for it, or the surrender of privacy and other civil rights. The tying of any such stipulations to a UBI or a National Dividend would be completely at odds with the Douglas Social Credit vision for society and must be vehemently opposed on that basis by freedom-loving people everywhere. A conditional UBI would not lead to greater freedom in the long run, but only to less freedom, perhaps even to much less freedom than we enjoy at present, depending on the nature of the conditions the state imposes and their scope. In…
    Written on Monday, 23 March 2020 18:01
  • Thus Spake C.H. Douglas ... Zoroastrianism and Social Credit
    We have been accustomed, in Social Credit circles, to describe Douglas Social Credit as ‘practical Christianity’, and I think that this is indeed correct. Nevertheless, for some time I have noticed various points of contact between Social Credit and the Zoroastrian religion. This, too, shouldn’t come as any surprise or be seen as a contradiction, since the particular vision of the world shared by the prophet Zoroaster exerted a heavy influence, especially during the Babylonian Captivity, on Old Testament Judaism and thereby on Christianity. The Persian Zoroastrian King, Cyrus, is recognized in the Bible as being anointed by God and inspired by Him to liberate the Jews in Babylon. Cyrus, for his part, appears to have recognized the God of Israel and his own God as being one and the same. Furthermore, there is a direct connection between Zoroastrianism and Christianity insofar as Zoroaster had predicted the coming of a…
    Written on Thursday, 05 March 2020 17:34