Social Credit News

Wednesday, 13 August 2014 07:07

Tax Freedom Day - Canada

Written by Oliver Heydorn
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Once again this year, the Canadian Fraser Institute has dutifully calculated “Tax Freedom Day”: “The Fraser Institute annually calculates Tax Freedom Day in order to provide a comprehensive and easily understood indicator of the overall tax burden faced by the average Canadian family. Tax Freedom Day is the day in the year by which the average Canadian family has earned enough money to pay all taxes imposed on it by the three levels of Canadian government: federal, provincial, and local. If Canadians were required to pay all taxes up front, they would have to give governments each and every dollar they earned prior to Tax Freedom Day. In 2014, Tax Freedom Day fell on June 9, one day later than 2013 when Tax Freedom Day fell on June 8.”: http://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/canadians-celebrate-tax-freedom-day-june-9-2014  

From a Social Credit perspective, the bulk of this taxation is entirely unnecessary. Eliminate chronic public debts (federal, provincial, and municipal) and you eliminate the taxes necessary to service these debts with their accompanying interest charges. Eliminate welfare, workfare, public pensions, employment insurance, and other related social programmes by providing everyone with a National Dividend funded debt-free in conjunction with a debt-free National Discount and you eliminate the tax money necessary to fund the programmes themselves and their accompanying bureaucracies. Eliminate most forms of taxation by replacing all of them with simple sales taxes and user fees (when appropriate) and the tremendous bureaucracies involved in maintaining the income and property tax systems could also be eliminated. Any individual or group who is genuinely interested in reducing the high levels of taxation under which we labour should take a serious look at Social Credit as it offers the best solution to this particular form of economic oppression.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

3 comments

  • Comment Link  Walter Booth Friday, 09 February 2018 22:54 posted by Walter Booth

    I email a comment back to you a few minutes ago but the website I sent should be this:-

    http://www.peoplesmandate.iinet.net.au/your_will_be_done.pdf

    WRB, 2nd December 2015.

  • Comment Link  Walter Booth Friday, 09 February 2018 22:54 posted by Walter Booth

    We in the British Commonwealth should each get hold of this statement made by Arthur A. Chresby a Research Analyst in Constitutional Law and apply it to our own country.
    Go to this website to see what it entails:- http://www.peoplesmandate.iinet.net.au/your_wii_be_done.pdf
    This is based on Australia and is a simple, non-technical beginners book of the true legal functions of the Queen, Governor General, State Governors, Parliament and Parliamentarians and the people.
    In my mind a politician is your representative in parliament and as such is YOUR servant. A servant only needs to know two words, YES SIR OR MADAM. I remember going to a political meeting and when the candidates were asked to give their definition of Democracy the first one got up and said, "You elect us and we rule you." He obviously didn't know what his true position was which is to serve. A servant. Every candidate said the same thing. They do not know what their position is. In New Zealand here they say they represent the National Party, Labour Party, Greens, whatever,,,, but they do not represent us. They say so. We must take this responsibility onto our shoulders and stop electing these people and then complain that they are not doing this or that till the next election and then elect the same type of person again. Read C H Douglas he points this out very clearly especially in his later years. He only wanted the Money System changed the same as Christ did to allow this to happen. He was hung on a cross in the most dramatic murder of all times, "I came that you may live life more abundantly." He didn't chaff on about more jobs, the amount of tax to be paid, the share market, what the interest was. He wanted you to live more abundantly.

  • Comment Link  Liam Allone Friday, 09 February 2018 22:53 posted by Liam Allone

    Well Said. But then all the nay-sayers will say "But what about all the jobs these tax regimes and social programs support?" Of course we know the correct answer is "Who cares?" With a guaranteed income, useless jobs and make work projects can and should suffer an unceremonious death - with prejudice. The thinking man should ask himself, "How did our governments fund themselves before Income Tax?" They had expensive armies and Ministries of this and that. The answer is they created the funds out of thin air - as was their prerogative. That prerogative is even embedded in the US Constitution Article 1. The Bank of Canada Act also contains it.

Latest Articles

  • Living Beyond Your Means
    We are often told that people should not ‘live beyond their means’, that is, that no individual person, nor any corporate entity like a business or a government, should spend more money during a given period than they take in as income or as revenue. Doing so is judged to be profligate, irresponsible, and only setting oneself up for pain in the long run. For countless centuries, if not millennia, the balanced ‘budget’ has been regarded as the sine qua non of fiscal prudence and ‘sound’ finance. And yet, if we look at our economies over any given period of time, it is quite normal for individual consumers, considered in the aggregate, to spend more than they receive in income, for governments at all levels to spend more than they take in viataxes, and even for businesses, considered again as a whole, to spend more money (thanks to long-term capital…
    Written on Monday, 15 July 2019 13:21 Read more...
  • Why Overt Monetary Financing of a UBI Need Not Result in Demand Inflation
    When one explains to the common person the proposal of a National Dividend as a state created and distributed monetary gift given to all as a credit for the nation’s total production, there is one very common objection or concern that people often raise. They think that there is a danger that this will result in inflation or a devaluing of the nation’s currency, a devaluation that may even been as bad as the hyperinflation that has recently taken place in Zimbabwe or Venezuela as a result of severe political corruption, incompetence, or foreign interference. But before one can understand why a 'debt-free' 'basic income' is not inflationary, or need not be inflationary, one must first understand something of the economic and monetary theory upon which this suggestion is based, namely Douglas Social Credit.
    Written on Monday, 08 July 2019 14:09 Read more...
  • Financing a Basic Income Through the Money Creation Powers of the Bank of Canada
    "The money creation process employed by the Bank of Canada is quite simple and mirrors the money creation process which, through the private banking system, is responsible for the greater majority of our money supply.[1]Contrary to what many people assume, banks are not borrowers and lenders of pre-existing money, but are rather creators and destroyers of the money that they issue in the form of bank credit. The same holds true for the Central Bank. Whenever an auction of new government securities is held, the Bank of Canada buys a certain percentage of these securities by creating digital accounting entries in the Federal Government’s deposit account with the bank. This deposit is recorded as a liability of the bank, while the newly purchased security is recorded as an asset on the Bank of Canada’s balance sheet."
    Written on Sunday, 07 July 2019 18:28 Read more...