Social Credit News

Wednesday, 13 August 2014 07:07

Tax Freedom Day - Canada

Written by Oliver Heydorn
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Once again this year, the Canadian Fraser Institute has dutifully calculated “Tax Freedom Day”: “The Fraser Institute annually calculates Tax Freedom Day in order to provide a comprehensive and easily understood indicator of the overall tax burden faced by the average Canadian family. Tax Freedom Day is the day in the year by which the average Canadian family has earned enough money to pay all taxes imposed on it by the three levels of Canadian government: federal, provincial, and local. If Canadians were required to pay all taxes up front, they would have to give governments each and every dollar they earned prior to Tax Freedom Day. In 2014, Tax Freedom Day fell on June 9, one day later than 2013 when Tax Freedom Day fell on June 8.”: http://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/canadians-celebrate-tax-freedom-day-june-9-2014  

From a Social Credit perspective, the bulk of this taxation is entirely unnecessary. Eliminate chronic public debts (federal, provincial, and municipal) and you eliminate the taxes necessary to service these debts with their accompanying interest charges. Eliminate welfare, workfare, public pensions, employment insurance, and other related social programmes by providing everyone with a National Dividend funded debt-free in conjunction with a debt-free National Discount and you eliminate the tax money necessary to fund the programmes themselves and their accompanying bureaucracies. Eliminate most forms of taxation by replacing all of them with simple sales taxes and user fees (when appropriate) and the tremendous bureaucracies involved in maintaining the income and property tax systems could also be eliminated. Any individual or group who is genuinely interested in reducing the high levels of taxation under which we labour should take a serious look at Social Credit as it offers the best solution to this particular form of economic oppression.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

3 comments

  • Comment Link  Walter Booth Friday, 09 February 2018 22:54 posted by Walter Booth

    I email a comment back to you a few minutes ago but the website I sent should be this:-

    http://www.peoplesmandate.iinet.net.au/your_will_be_done.pdf

    WRB, 2nd December 2015.

  • Comment Link  Walter Booth Friday, 09 February 2018 22:54 posted by Walter Booth

    We in the British Commonwealth should each get hold of this statement made by Arthur A. Chresby a Research Analyst in Constitutional Law and apply it to our own country.
    Go to this website to see what it entails:- http://www.peoplesmandate.iinet.net.au/your_wii_be_done.pdf
    This is based on Australia and is a simple, non-technical beginners book of the true legal functions of the Queen, Governor General, State Governors, Parliament and Parliamentarians and the people.
    In my mind a politician is your representative in parliament and as such is YOUR servant. A servant only needs to know two words, YES SIR OR MADAM. I remember going to a political meeting and when the candidates were asked to give their definition of Democracy the first one got up and said, "You elect us and we rule you." He obviously didn't know what his true position was which is to serve. A servant. Every candidate said the same thing. They do not know what their position is. In New Zealand here they say they represent the National Party, Labour Party, Greens, whatever,,,, but they do not represent us. They say so. We must take this responsibility onto our shoulders and stop electing these people and then complain that they are not doing this or that till the next election and then elect the same type of person again. Read C H Douglas he points this out very clearly especially in his later years. He only wanted the Money System changed the same as Christ did to allow this to happen. He was hung on a cross in the most dramatic murder of all times, "I came that you may live life more abundantly." He didn't chaff on about more jobs, the amount of tax to be paid, the share market, what the interest was. He wanted you to live more abundantly.

  • Comment Link  Liam Allone Friday, 09 February 2018 22:53 posted by Liam Allone

    Well Said. But then all the nay-sayers will say "But what about all the jobs these tax regimes and social programs support?" Of course we know the correct answer is "Who cares?" With a guaranteed income, useless jobs and make work projects can and should suffer an unceremonious death - with prejudice. The thinking man should ask himself, "How did our governments fund themselves before Income Tax?" They had expensive armies and Ministries of this and that. The answer is they created the funds out of thin air - as was their prerogative. That prerogative is even embedded in the US Constitution Article 1. The Bank of Canada Act also contains it.

Latest Articles

  • Financial Credit as a Merit Good
    The debt­-finance system, by generating a chronic insufficiency of purchasing power, thereby requiring increased borrowing (in lieu of large trade surpluses) if economic activity is not to grind to a halt, causes the State ­ with its great, almost unlimited capacity to borrow, thanks to its power to tax (i.e. creditors are eager to lend to it in the knowledge that it will always have a means to pay them back), to expand its role in the economy. Thus, as society finds its purchasing power increasingly insufficient to satisfy its requirements, the State steps in, with its role becoming larger and larger as it fills the growing gap. Caught unawares by these developments, which they were utterly incapable of anticipating, economists scrambled to come up with theories explaining ­ and indeed, justifying ­ such extensive government intervention.
    Wednesday, 29 August 2018 14:16 Read more...
  • Visualizing the Gap
    The central contention of the Social Credit critique of contemporary economic management (or rather mismanagement) is the existence of a gap between prices and incomes in the operation of any modern economy - i.e. an economy based on debt-finance and multi-stage, mechanized production. This underlying deficiency of purchasing power, makes it impossible to liquidate the costs of production without resorting to increased debt and/or a large trade surplus - since prices cannot fall below costs without putting the continued operation of an enterprise in peril, (unless it can rely on direct or indirect government support). Furthermore, the critique contends that this gap is bound to grow as the economy becomes more sophisticated - i.e. as production involves more and more stages, and use of machinery increases - entailing spiralling debt and increasing trade tensions if the necessary financial remedies are not applied.
    Tuesday, 28 August 2018 13:37 Read more...
  • Social Credit and Democracy: The Problem - Part Two
    In this second article, I will continue to examine some of the structural problems with conventional democratic political systems that Douglas had identified in the course of his writings, especially in the writings of his latter years. Beyond the particular defects in the voting system which were discussed in the previous month’s article, there are also problems with the party system and with how the voting and party systems interact with each other. Since there is quite a bit of information to cover, I beg the reader’s indulgence if the following is reminiscent of a lawyer’s seriatim brief.
    Monday, 20 August 2018 17:27 Read more...