Sunday, 05 March 2017 23:20

The Social Credit Bottom Line

Written by M. Oliver Heydorn
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The modern, industrial system possesses an enormous productive capacity, both actual and potential, to meet our legitimate needs for goods and services. With every technological advancement we can produce more and/or better with less resource consumption and less human labour.

Now, if we had an honest financial system, i.e., one that accurately registered and reflected these physical economic realities, the cost of living would be much lower than it currently is and it would be falling steadily, while the decreased need for human input in the form of work would be represented by the continual expansion of paid leisure.


If, instead, we continue to operate under the existing dishonest and dysfunctional financial system, we condemn ourselves to Sisyphean exercises in futility, as we vainly struggle to make an insufficient flow of income cover an increasing flow of corresponding prices.

 

The choice between function and dysfunction is ours.

More in this category: « Social Credit in a Sentence

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

3 comments

  • Comment Link Oliver Heydorn Thursday, 22 March 2018 23:34 posted by Oliver Heydorn

    Hi J.B.,

    Yes, the A+B theorem applies to all productive agencies operating under industrial and standard financial conventions. Small enterprises offering financial services or producing software programmes still have B costs in the form of various overheads (rent, equipment, etc.). The fact that the B factor may not be as great relative to incomes in those cases does not negate the existence of the B factor (which causes the flow prices - A+B - to exceed the flow of incomes - A.

  • Comment Link JB Thursday, 22 March 2018 23:30 posted by JB

    Just to clarify some social credit statements: When one reads the likes of "[The} A+B theorem...demonstrates the fact that all [business] firms are generating costs at a faster rate than they are distributing incomes"; does this apply to small enterprises producing certain financial services or producing software programmes? (Apparently such companies have minimal costs but generate considerable incomes.)

    Or does one have confusion between incomes and profit?

    Many thanks.

    JB

  • Comment Link Wallace Klinck Thursday, 22 March 2018 23:29 posted by Wallace Klinck

    An excellent summary alluding to the enormous waste built in to our existing economic system consequent to accepted conventions of industrial cost-accountancy and unsound finance as provided by the banking system. C. H. Douglas profoundly explained the situation by his statement that we must distribute goods and services on the basis of work completed and not on the basis of work in progress. In other words, we must ensure that consumers at large have always sufficient incomes to purchase the entire final product of industry as it emerges from the production line.

    Human energy is a diminishing factor of production in the modern economy, where it is being rapidly replaced by technology providing enormously greater efficiency. We must abandon the anachronistic, unrealistic and false moralistic position that access to consumer goods is only or primarily justified by direct participation by individuals in production processes. The logical conclusions to be drawn from this erroneous and dogmatic belief are that the end of man is either endless manufacture of goods and services, regardless of actual need or desire, or that efficiency is to be abjured as something evil or undesirable. Both positions are an obvious fatal impediment to the flowering of anything worthy of being called Civilization.

Latest Articles

  • The Scales and the Dam
    "One of the very first lessons in a typical introductory economics course - and rarely, if ever questioned by either teacher or pupil - is the existence of resource scarcity coupled with the unlimited desires of humanity. Students are then informed that economics is the 'science' of managing (rather than overcoming) this scarcity - and in time, they learn how to manage it in their favour at the expense of others."
    Written on Sunday, 10 March 2019 17:11 Read more...
  • The Hydroelectric Dam as a Metaphor for Social Credit
    In a recent paper entitled “The Scales and the Dam: Static and Dynamic Conceptions of the Economy”, Arindam Basu has introduced a brilliant metaphor that can be adapted in various ways to explain both how the economy functions under the existing financial system and how it would function under Social Credit: “A typical run-of-river hydroelectric dam, which uses a flow of water to generate a flow of electricity, may serve quite well as a metaphor for an economy that converts a flow of money into a flow of goods and services.”[1] As Arindam notes, this analogy can be developed further in a variety of ways.
    Written on Friday, 08 March 2019 17:31 Read more...
  • Social Credit and Democracy: The Problem - Part Five
    Thus far, we have looked at the whats and the whys of the financial domination of liberal democracy. It is now time that we turn to a more detailed examination of the hows. Let us begin with the general observation that, in a society operating under the Monopoly of Credit, organized political activity, like most other activities, is largely dependent – directly or indirectly – on Finance. Money, both in the form of producer credit and in the form of income, is maintained in a state of artificial scarcity, and Finance will naturally be inclined to ration it to those who do its will and to punish those who resist by denying them access to the life-giving credit. Credit, in turn, is a necessary means for obtaining most of the material and human resources required for political action. In this way, Finance can condition political activity to the point of…
    Written on Monday, 31 December 2018 22:25 Read more...