Action FAQ

1. What is the Social Credit movement?

The Social Credit movement is a world-wide movement of individuals which has existed since the early 1920’s. Social Crediters are people who: a) wish to live in much healthier societies, i.e., societies that are politically and economically functional rather than dysfunctional (in view of the true purposes of economic and political association) and who: b) believe that the social analysis and remedial proposals of C.H. Douglas encapsulate the key policies, principles, and mechanisms that must be adopted if this goal is to be successfully achieved. As such, the Social Credit movement is both open to and in need of the co-operation of each and every individual, prior to and independently of any question of race, ethnicity, gender, nationality, political or religious affiliation, etc. By working in a co-operative, law-abiding, and non-violent manner, Social Crediters are confident that economic and political associations can be suitably re-aligned (i.e., in keeping with the correct principles of association) so as to deliver far more satisfactory results to their individual members.

2. What are "Social Credit Action Groups"?

Social Credit Action Groups are self-organizing and self-financing groups which work under the banner of the C.H. Douglas Institute in order to forward, in a concrete way, the aims of the Social Credit movement. They represent an attempt to make use of the correct principles of association so that Social Crediters can effectively associate in the service of common interests. We suggest that each group should be small, i.e., composed of a minimum of three or four persons and a maximum of twelve persons, with a President, Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer. Groups that register with the Institute will have the name of the group and its leader, together with the Groups contact information, placed on this website so that interested individuals may affiliate with groups in their local areas.

3. What sorts of activities may Social Credit Action Groups undertake?

In seeking to bring society into alignment with Social Credit principles, Social Credit Action Groups may choose to engage in a number of activities that will broadly fall into one of two categories: a) education and b) political action. The purpose of Social Credit education is to raise the general level of awareness regarding the Social Credit analysis and remedial proposals as well as Social Credit themes and concerns among the general public, or else to train individuals who may become Social Credit technicians and expositors. Activities that lend themselves to this end may include, for example, the formation of study and reading circles, the holding of lectures and rallies, and the distribution of Social Credit literature. The purpose of Social Credit political action is to put pressure on the centres of political power so that they will become aware of, take seriously, and eventually implement Social Credit principles into the economic and political life of one’s nation. Activities that can be undertaken in service of this end may include, for example, letter writing campaigns to political representatives, the lobbying of public officials, and electoral campaigns (organizing the population so that they will only vote for candidates who, regardless of political party affiliation, promise to support Social Credit policies). It is important that Social Crediters speak in one coherent voice in order to maximize their effectiveness. Relying on a centralized source for information will ensure the integrity and recognisability of the message. For this reason, the Institute freely provides a number of resources (such as pamphlets and leaflets) which can be used as promotional material.

Follow us on

 

Latest Articles

  • The Creditary Nature of Money in Post Scarcity
    The Austrian School of economics maintains that money originated as a high-saleability commodity selected by market forces to reduce barter friction, treating credit as a secondary mechanism backed by pre-existing physical savings. This paper demonstrates that the Austrian foundational model rests on dual empirical and operational fallacies: the myth of commodity money and the myth of absolute physical scarcity. Drawing on A. Mitchell Innes’s credit theory of money, modern balance-sheet mechanics, C.H. Douglas’s Social Credit analysis, and the realities of modern industrial capacity, we show that money has always been credit—a system of clearing debt—and that credit creation precedes both savings and physical production. In a technological era characterized by systemic capacity abundance, holding to gold-standard or loanable-funds assumptions misdiagnoses the nature of financial capital, misunderstands the true drivers of inflation, and severely distorts macroeconomic analysis.
    Written on Sunday, 23 August 2026 12:14 Read more...
  • Morality, Douglas Social Credit, and Economics
    It is possible to frame the Douglas Social Credit diagnosis for our financial and economic woes, as well as its remedial proposals for monetary reform in the common interest of the citizenry, in terms of morality. Like the thread of Ariadne that led Theseus through the labyrinth of the Minotaur and safely out again, a specific understanding or conception of morality can serve as the fil conducteur—the guiding thread—which unfolds the DSC diagnosis and remedial proposals step by step in a systematic, logical way. Yet the deeper reason this moral framing actually succeeds as an explanatory heuristic is that the DSC model is itself endogenously moral: morality is not to be applied to the system from outside by the action of some agent (who presumably directs the system to moral as opposed to immoral ends); rather, morality is built right into the ordinary operating structure and everyday functioning of the…
    Written on Thursday, 06 August 2026 08:02 Read more...
  • The Canadian Federal Debt Debate: Auditor General Numbers, Framing, Causality, and a Social Credit Lens
    Understanding this question concerning federal debt in precise terms matters. It moves us beyond simplistic "debt trap" stories or denials of fiscal pressures toward a nuanced recognition of trade-offs, agency, and alternatives. Sustainable fiscal policy requires primary balance discipline, growth-enhancing reforms, and — in line with the Douglas Social Credit monetary reform proposals — exploration of more direct, less burdensome mechanisms to ensure adequate purchasing power. Canada's experience from 1974 onward offers lessons in both the power and perils of relying on debt-financed demand management.
    Written on Tuesday, 30 June 2026 10:25 Read more...